Approfondimenti

Benvenuti nella nostra pagina di risorse, dove condividiamo approfondimenti ed expertise nell’adattività organizzativa, agilità, lean, pratiche di leadership, trasformazione digitale e, più in generale, nell’evoluzione delle pratiche lavorative. Scoprite strategie pratiche, framework collaudati e approcci innovativi per aiutare la vostra organizzazione a prosperare nell’ambiente aziendale dinamico di oggi.

Painted illustration of a roof made of a network of connected nodes, resting on a beam carried by five pillars; in front of each pillar sits a person at a desk, discussing and pointing, so every pillar has someone responsible for it

Leaders get AI wrong in two ways that look like leadership: handing the decision to IT, or ordering adoption from the top without understanding what AI can do. This first article of the series AI as a Leadership Responsibility explains why both failures are structural, and names five decisions that need a clear owner before AI agents are used at scale.

Di: Society for Adaptive Organisations

Pubblicato:

Adaptive Organisations Artificial Intelligence AI as a Leadership Responsibility Adaptive Leadership
Illustration of three panels joined by arrows: on the left a loose scatter of dots, in the highlighted middle the same dots settling into a neat grid, and on the right rows of identical blocks stacked up in quantity, all three connected underneath by a single line

Ambidexterity gives organisations two hands, one to exploit the known and one to explore the new, but it misses the middle where most innovations actually die. This third article of the series on the dimensions of adaptivity introduces organisational multidexterity: explore, exact and exploit, held at once, with separate structures, protected investment and the courage to let go of what no longer serves.

Di: Society for Adaptive Organisations

Pubblicato:

Adaptive Organisations Dimensions of Adaptivity Ambidexterity Innovation
Illustration of two timelines of the same length: on the upper one a single slow loop sits at the far end, on the lower one many short loops follow each other and climb step by step towards the upper right

The distance between what an organisation assumes and what is actually true is its real measure of risk, and the speed at which it closes that gap is its rate of learning. This second article of the series on the dimensions of adaptivity explains why plans must be treated as hypotheses, why shortening the cycle is not working faster, and which structural, cultural and relational conditions must hold together for fast learning to compound.

Di: Society for Adaptive Organisations

Pubblicato:

Adaptive Organisations Dimensions of Adaptivity Fast Improvement Cycles Learning Organisation
Illustration of three separate blocks standing apart with dashed gaps between them and a dotted line that never reaches a customer below, and beside them a single team enclosing three coloured blocks with a solid arrow running straight down to the customer

Most organisations are built like a food factory: structured around functions and components, with the customer's result stitched together across the boundaries between them. This first article of the series on the dimensions of adaptivity explains solution orientation, why component teams see no customer, what the shift to solution teams actually costs, and why cutting accidental complexity is a direct lever on speed.

Di: Society for Adaptive Organisations

Pubblicato:

Adaptive Organisations Dimensions of Adaptivity Product Orientation Teams
Illustration of a score sheet on a clipboard with six rows, each scored from one to five on a row of dots, the lowest-scoring row highlighted and examined through a magnifying glass

Every clause in the definition of an adaptive organisation is a load-bearing condition, and the only honest response to a specification is to test yourself against it. This second article of the series turns the definition into six checks, scored from one to five, worked from the foundations upwards — with a printable summary sheet and guidance on why the clauses that fail together tell you more than any average.

Di: Society for Adaptive Organisations

Pubblicato:

Adaptive Organisations Definition Self-assessment Complexity & Systems Thinking
Illustration of a house in cross-section: a navy foundation slab carrying two elements, above it a floor holding three coloured blocks, then a floor containing a network of connected nodes, and an orange roof enclosing a cycle arrow, with an arrow rising along the left side

The Society's definition of an adaptive organisation is not a slogan but a piece of engineering. Read closely, it is built in four layers — discipline, terrain, capabilities and foundations — each resting on the one below. This first article of the series on the definition shows why the sentence reads downwards but only works upwards, and why leadership is the load-bearing element the diagram leaves out.

Di: Society for Adaptive Organisations

Pubblicato:

Adaptive Organisations Definition Complexity & Systems Thinking Leadership & Organisational Development
Diagram showing AI as an amplifier: from an organisation before AI, a green path leads to strong foundations with amplified output and compounding gains, while a red dashed path leads to weak foundations with amplified dysfunction and accelerated failure

The organisations that will thrive with AI are not those that adopt the most tools fastest, but those that build the capacity to keep adapting. A more-than-half-century-old law from cybernetics explains why.

Di: Dr. Jürgen Hoffmann and Pierluigi Pugliese

Pubblicato:

Adaptive Organisations Artificial Intelligence Requisite Variety Adaptive Capacity
Diagram showing the enterprise regulator R (with Model M and step mechanism σ) absorbing disturbances D from the environment to keep essential variables E within viability bounds, with the outevolve condition μ = d/dt V(R) − d/dt V(D) > 0

Most discussions of adaptive organisations ask the wrong question. Adaptiveness is a snapshot; evolvability — the structural capacity to keep generating useful change — is the film. This piece draws on Ashby's cybernetics, biology's evolvability research, and the AME3 framework to show what that distinction demands in practice.

Di: Andreas Schliep

Pubblicato:

Adaptive Organisations Evolvability Requisite Variety Cybernetics
Perché i programmi di trasformazione falliscono prima ancora di iniziaren

La maggior parte dei programmi di trasformazione si concentra su cambiamenti visibili, mentre la logica più profonda dell’organizzazione rimane invariata. Un cambiamento sostenibile diventa possibile solo quando le organizzazioni sono in grado di mettere in discussione e riprogettare le assunzioni che stanno alla base dei loro processi decisionali.

Di: Ilker Demirel

Pubblicato:

Adaptive Organisationen Organisationale Transformation System Thinking Change Management
Metà superiore della copertina dell'articolo di Harvard Business Review di Nonaka e Takeuchi del 1986

Nel gennaio 1986, due professori giapponesi pubblicarono un articolo che avrebbe ridefinito il modo in cui il mondo pensa all'innovazione. Non attraverso una grande teoria, ma attraverso una metafora del rugby. Hirotaka Takeuchi e Ikujiro Nonaka avevano trascorso anni studiando come le aziende più competitive in Giappone e negli Stati Uniti sviluppavano effettivamente nuovi prodotti. Ciò che scoprirono contraddiceva tutto ciò che il mondo del management dava per scontato.

Di: Dr. Jürgen Hoffmann

Pubblicato:

Organizzazioni adattive Sviluppo prodotto Multilearning
Illustration representing product management as the engine of adaptive organisations

Un’organizzazione adattiva si definisce attraverso la sua capacità di prendere decisioni efficaci e decentralizzate, di apprendere continuamente e di allineare le azioni di oggi con le opportunità future in condizioni di incertezza. Si basa sull’auto-organizzazione, sulla misurazione orientata ai risultati e sulla leadership intesa come pratica continua di apprendimento, piuttosto che su strutture rigide o sul controllo. Nel complesso, l’adattività emerge dalla progettazione consapevole dei processi decisionali, della collaborazione e dell’apprendimento, per navigare la complessità e consentire un cambiamento continuo.

Di: Ilker Demirel

Pubblicato:

Organizzazione adattiva Leadership e sviluppo organizzativo Complessità e pensiero sistemico
Illustration representing product management as the engine of adaptive organisations

Organisations today face a paradox: they must deliver value reliably today whilst simultaneously preparing for an uncertain tomorrow. This article explores why sound product management, combined with the structural shift to product orientation, is essential for building truly adaptive organisations. Learn how product management creates coherence, enables fast learning, and provides the strategic discipline needed to thrive in dynamic markets.

Di: Pierluigi Pugliese

Pubblicato:

Adaptive Organisations Product Management Product Orientation Strategy
cut out from org chart

Matrix organisation has well-known problems. Combining Back-Front and Modular organisation designs gives you options for creating adaptive organisation, productive teamwork, and market focus.

Di: Ran Nyman

Pubblicato:

Adaptive Organisations Org chart Teams
Immagine simbolica del lavoro di squadra come partita di calcio

Nell'era dell'intelligenza artificiale e del lavoro a distanza, ci si chiede se i team tradizionali stiano diventando obsoleti. L'articolo mette alla prova le cinque condizioni di Hackman per i team efficaci rispetto al dynamic teaming e all'IA: i team restano rilevanti, ma solo a determinate condizioni.

Di: Andreas Schliep

Pubblicato:

Organizzazioni adattive Principi agili Team IA nella collaborazione
Symbolic image of adaptive organisations with connected spheres

This whitepaper examines how organisations can develop genuine adaptability in rapidly changing markets. Traditional functional structures fail when confronted by agile competitors. We identify three essential pillars: product orientation (organising around complete value streams), fast learning cycles (feedback loops measured in days, not quarters), and organisational ambidexterity (exploiting current capabilities whilst exploring new opportunities). Underpinning these is adaptive leadership that enables rather than directs. Organisations that commit to this transformation do not merely survive disruption but create it, generating new markets rather than defending eroding positions.

Di: Mario Gadet and Pierluigi Pugliese

Pubblicato:

Adaptive Organisations Product Orientation Ambidexterity Adaptive Leadership Learning Organisation
Symbolic image of adaptive organisations with connected spheres

The article examines the internal and external perspectives on the survivability of organisations. One possible external perspective is reflected in stock market trading data, while one possible internal perspective arises from the knowledge we have about the organisation to which we belong. Four metaphors representing organisations with varying degrees of adaptability provide a good starting point for discussion.

Di: Dr. Jürgen Hoffmann

Pubblicato:

Adaptive Organisations viability ambidexterity adaptive archetypes